Selected Accessibility Barriers — Methodology

The Selected accessibility barriers card highlights open findings for seven selected axe-core rules. It is a prioritization aid, not a probability of a lawsuit, a legal-risk score, or a finding that a whole WCAG criterion fails. The existing URL is retained for earlier links.

Selected rules

RuleWCAG referenceCondition
image-alt1.1.1Images without alternative text
label3.3.2 / 4.1.2Inputs without associated labels
color-contrast1.4.3Insufficient text contrast
bypass2.4.1Missing mechanism to bypass repeated content
link-name2.4.4Links without accessible names
button-name4.1.2Buttons without accessible names
html-has-lang3.1.1Missing page language

How to read the status

Dashboard labelMeaning
Priority reviewA selected rule has a critical or serious finding.
Findings presentSelected rules have moderate or minor findings only.
No selected matchesNone of these seven rules appears in the open findings.

The card displays observed rule matches and their severity. It does not convert homepage prevalence statistics into lawsuit probabilities. Its internal legacy field names do not change that interpretation.

Scope and limitations

A result applies to the pages and states actually scanned. Other automated findings and manual checks still require review even when no selected matches appear. Assess impact using the affected elements and the website's workflows; the card is not a substitute for a complete evaluation.

For testing methodology, see W3C's evaluation overview and the axe-core rule documentation. WebAIM Million describes issue prevalence on sampled homepages; it does not measure your website's legal exposure.